Legal Opinion
Tallon v. Grand Portage Copper Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1884PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to Houghton. (Steere, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
The plaintiff in this case claims damages for the breach of a contract for hire for a year.
The contract reads as follows:
“This agreement, made the 29th day of October, A. D. 1880 between M. L. Tallón and Grand Portage Copper Mining Company, both of Houghton county, Michigan. The said M. L. Tallón has agreed to enter into the service of the said Grand Portage Copper Mining Company as general superintendent of said mine, both underground, and on surface and promises faithfully, honestly and diligently to devote his time to the best interests of the said Grand Portage Copper Mining Company. In…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Sines v. Superintendents of the PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Chamberlain v. Detroit Stove WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Standard Oil Co. v. Gilbert & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Reynick v. Aldington & Curtis Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Fitch v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.