Legal Opinion
Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 14, 2014No. Nos. G049907, G049910PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, J.
I.-II.*
III. DISCUSSION
A.-I.*
J. Did the Trial Court Err in Awarding the Lien Claimants Prejudgment Interest at 10 Percent, as Distinct from 7 Percent, as Against the Noncontracting, Innocent Owners? Yes.
This is the only part of this opinion certified for publication, so we set forth a brief précis of the relevant facts for the benefit of those readers who will not have access to the balance of the opinion; In 2007, a developer named Inland engaged a general contractor called 361 to develop a Kohl’s department store and surrounding property on a tract in Beaumont. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Marine Terminals Corp. v. Paceco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Royster Construction Co. v. Urban West CommunitiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Bay Lumber Co. v. PickeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carmel Development Co., Inc. v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Valley Commercial Contractors v. Windsor Walnut Creek Apt CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
- XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. v. Hayward Property, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. v. Hayward Property, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022