Legal Opinion

Pall Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Pti Technologies Inc., and Kurabo Industries, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 7, 2001No. 00-1203, 00-1215PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

PTI Technologies Inc. (“PTI”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granting the motion of Pall Corporation (“Pall”) for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,663,041 (the “ ’041 patent”), the dismissal of PTI’s counterclaim for infringement of the ’041 patent, and the denial of PTI’s request for a permanent injunction. Pall Corp. v. PTI Techs. Inc., Nos. CV-97-1134, CV-98-2871 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2000) (“judgment” or “Pall II”). Pall cross-appeals the district court’s grant of PTI’s motion for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Carl B. Bai v. L & L Wings, Inc., D/B/A Wings, and Great World Co. Of New York Ltd., and Elufa Fashions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Computer Docking Station Corp. v. Dell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. Ecolab, Inc. v. Envirochem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Springs Window Fashions Lp, Shade-O-Matic Ltd., and Manor Tec, Inc. v. Novo Industries, L.P., Defendant-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  5. Rheox, Inc. v. Entact, Inc., Defendant/third Party v. Rmt, Inc. And American Minerals, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API