Legal Opinion

Sumner v. Darnell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1891No. 14,651PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the "Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This was an action by the appellants against the appellee to recover certain real estate in Centreville, Wayne county. The complaint was in four paragraphs. A demurrer was sustained to the second paragraph, and the cause was put at issue by an answer in denial.

The errors assigned in this court relate only to the overruling of a motion made by the appellants for a new trial, and to exceptions to the conclusions of law upon the special findings of fact.

The motion for a new trial was predicated upon the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding. We have read the evidence…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Sohier v. Trinity ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Warren v. MayorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  4. Raley v. Umatilla CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Lawe v. HydeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Adams v. First Baptist Church of St. CharlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Sheets v. Vandalia Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Daggett v. City of Ft. WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API