Legal Opinion
Koppel v. Koppel (In Re Koppel)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 6, 1994No. 1-19-40839PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ROBERT JOHN HALL, Bankruptcy Judge.
RELEVANT FACTS AND LEGAL DISCUSSION
Before the Court 1 is a motion by Plaintiff for an order authorizing amendment of her Adversary Proceeding complaint to add an additional claim for relief. Plaintiff seeks to have the added claim relate back to the original pleading so that it is not time-barred. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) (1994) (made applicable by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7015 (1994) (discussed below)).
Plaintiff commenced the Adversary Proceeding by the filing of a complaint with the Court on January 21,1992. Pursuant to her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jerome Rosenberg v. Raymond v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Rural Fire Protection Company, a Corporation v. William E. HeppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Audrey L. Zeeman, Individually and as of the Estate of Leon S. Lees, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Pendrell v. Chatham CollegeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farraj v. Soliz (In Re Soliz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Union Planters Bank of Central Arkansas, N.A. v. Jagitsch (In Re Jagitsch)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
- Rodriguez v. Sneed (In re Sneed)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006