Legal Opinion
Gaydos v. Huntington National Bank
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 18, 1996No. 3:96CV7375PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is a truth-in-lending case in which plaintiffs allege that Huntington National Bank violated various disclosure requirements of the Consumer Leasing Act (CLA), 15 U.S.C. § 1667a, Ohio Uniform Commercial Code, O.R.C. § 1309.18, and Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act; O.R.C. § 1345.03. This Court has jurisdiction over the federal claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1337. Pending is defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Doc. 6). For the following reasons, defendant’s motion shall be granted as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Investment Company Institute v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- David C. Turner, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Steinmetz v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Wiskup v. Liberty Buick Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Valencia Carmichael v. Nissan Motor AcceptanceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Clement v. American Honda Finance Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.