Legal Opinion

United States v. Debruhl

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 2010No. 09-CO-1208PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Senior Judge:

This case presents the question whether the federal “exclusionary rule” should be applied retroactively to a pending case after the Supreme Court has issued a decision expanding Fourth Amendment protection that would benefit the defendant if the rule applies.

At the time of appellee Debruhl’s arrest for a traffic violation, New York v. Belton, 1 as commonly interpreted, allowed the police to search the passenger compartment of an automobile without a warrant, and virtually without restriction, when incident to a lawful arrest. Before Debruhl’s trial, however, in Arizona v.…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DanielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. United States v. DebruhlDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. McCain v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. In re T.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. FrederickIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API