United States v. Debruhl
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Senior Judge:
This case presents the question whether the federal “exclusionary rule” should be applied retroactively to a pending case after the Supreme Court has issued a decision expanding Fourth Amendment protection that would benefit the defendant if the rule applies.
At the time of appellee Debruhl’s arrest for a traffic violation, New York v. Belton, 1 as commonly interpreted, allowed the police to search the passenger compartment of an automobile without a warrant, and virtually without restriction, when incident to a lawful arrest. Before Debruhl’s trial, however, in Arizona v.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DanielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- United States v. DebruhlDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- McCain v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- In re T.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. FrederickIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.