Legal Opinion
United States v. Debruhl
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 23, 2012No. 09-CO-1208PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition for Rehearing
FERREN, Senior Judge:
After our initial hearing of this case, the court ruled in favor of the defendant-appellee, Lorenzo Ali Debruhl.1 We affirmed the trial court’s pre-trial ruling that the federal “exclusionary rule,” rather than the “good faith exception” to that *294rule, should be applied retroactively to enforce the Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona v. Gant.2 Thus, we affirmed suppression at trial of the drugs and related contraband found by the police in a war-rantless search of Debruhl’s car. After our decision, the Supreme Court addressed the good-faith…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Tuckson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- UNITED STATES v. DAVID D. LEWISDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- United States v. OladosuDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2012
- IN RE Q.B. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.