Legal Opinion

Adams v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 5, 1990No. A8807-03682; CA A60791PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This appeal is by defendant City of Hillsboro (Hills-boro) from the trial court’s denial of its claims for attorney fees and sanctions against plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ attorneys, Mechanic and the Goldberg, Mechanic and Goldstein law firm. ORS 20.105; ORCP 17. We affirm.

The underlying action arose out of a 1988 labor dispute between three unions and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest (Kaiser). Plaintiffs, who are taxpayers of Hillsboro but not union employees, were solicited by union representatives to pursue a declaratory judgment proceeding against various entities that had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. DeFazio v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hanson v. MosserOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Portland Development Commission v. CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Selective Services, Inc. v. AAA Liquidating & Auction Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API