Legal Opinion

People v. NYTAC Corp.

Suffolk County District Court

Decided August 27, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Stephen Hackeling, J.

NYTAC Corp., a criminal defendant in the above-referenced proceeding, moves this court for an order waiving the requirements of CPL 600.20 for the purpose of allowing the defendant *305to be arraigned and to participate and defend the action. The People have not interposed opposition to the requested relief.

For all criminal proceedings in the State of New York, corporate defendants are required to appear by counsel, whereas individual defendants can appear pro se. It is the opinion of the court that the statutory requirement that corporate criminals…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API