Legal Opinion

Hendrey v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1916No. 2546PublishedCited by 43 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee; John E. McCall, Judge. E. E. Hendrey and others were convicted of offenses, and they bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The four plaintiffs in error, Hendrey, Davis, Brooks and Wynne, were, jointly with five others, Cooke, *7Toenges, Chick, Bonds and White, indicted in the court below, for violating section 215 (using mails to defraud, R. S. § 5480) and section 37 (conspiracy, R. S. § 5440), of the Criminal Code (Comp. St. 1913, § 10,201).1 The first four counts alleged defendants’ participation in a fraudulent banking scheme, and, in each count, a different letter or paper sent through the mails in furtherance of the scheme. The fifth count charged a conspiracy to violate the law by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  2. Bettman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Coulston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. Banning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Bogy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API