Nevinnomysskiy Azot v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Judge:
Plaintiffs Nevinnomysskiy Azot, Novomoskovsk Azot JSC, JSC MCC Eurochem, Kuybyshevazot JSC, JSC “Azot” Berezniki, and JSC “Azot” Kemerovo (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “Russian Respondents”) move pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2 for judgment upon the agency record, requesting the court to remand the United States International Trade Commission’s (“ITC”) second sunset review determination. In an evenly divided vote, 1 the ITC Commissioners determined that revocation of antidumping duty (“AD”) orders on solid urea 2 imports from Russia and Ukraine (“subject imports”) likely…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.