Legal Opinion

Taylor v. American Airlines

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided July 24, 1996No. 95-0783-CV-W-9PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY COMPLAINT

BARTLETT, Chief Judge.

In the Complaint filed by Robert C. Taylor pro se, he asserts that he was improperly terminated from his job with defendant American Airlines. Taylor seeks $6,000,000 “which is meger (sic) to the riches (sic) airline in the free world.” See Complaint, paragraph 6.

American Airlines has filed a motion for summary judgment. Taylor opposes the motion for summary judgment and has filed a motion to modify his complaint.

I

Standard for Motion for Summary Judgment

Rule 56(c),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caravello v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API