State Ex Rel. Hausner v. Blackman
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rees, J.:
This is a paternity action. A jury found defendant to be the father of the child. Defendant appeals.
The initial issue on appeal is whether evidence concerning paternity exclusion blood testing was erroneously admitted to prove the single question in this case, that is, whether the defendant is the biological father of the child.
“In paternity exclusion testing, the presence or absence of certain genetically controlled factors [‘markers’] in the blood of the mother, child(ren), and alleged father(s) is determined. The patterns obtained are evaluated utilizing well-defined laws of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. Roland Addison, United States of America v. Albert Henry RaymondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mason v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Kofford Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. FloraUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- In the Interest of J.L.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Hausner v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.