Legal Opinion

LaBee v. Sultan Logging Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1907No. 6769PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered January 12, 1907, setting aside a nonsuit and granting a new trial, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee through the breaking of a cable.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action for personal injuries. At the time he received the injury for which he sues, the respondent was in the employ of the appellant, working with a *58gang of men engaged in loading sawlogs onto railroad cars. In loading the logs the men had the assistance of mechanical appliances. These consisted of a large heavy pole, some forty feet in length, known in the vernacular as a “gin pole,” set with the heavy end in the ground by the side of the railroad track, and slanted over the track so that the .upper end reached a point immediately above its center. The pole was stayed with three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moynihan v. Hills Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. RoeschIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Coleman v. Mechanics' Iron Foundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Armour v. GolkowskaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wodnik v. Luna Park Amusement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Anderson v. McCarthy Dry Goods Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Lynch v. Ninemire Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Graaf v. Vulcan Iron WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Penson v. Inland Empire Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API