Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 26, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 09-0751PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiffs Annette Forrester, Scott Walsh, Steven Walsh, and Lisa Cline (“the children”) appeal from the superior court’s award of zero dollars in damages for the wrongful death of their father. They claim that this award is insufficient under Rule 59(a)(5) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. The trial court considered the issue to have been waived. We uphold the jury’s right to award zero damages and remand for the court to rule on the Rule 59(a)(5) motion for new trial consistent with the principles that follow.

Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2 This appeal arises…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists CharteredArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  2. FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. State v. BlockmanWashington Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API