Legal Opinion

Courier-Journal Job Printing Co. v. Haag

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 14, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Third Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge-Nunn

Reversing.

The appellee sued the appellant for the loss of a finger, and recovered $800. The grounds of recovery were that appellant negligently failed to furnish her, an employee, a safe place, and a safe machine with which to work The appellant conducts a job printing establishment, employing numerous servants, and using the usual binding, folding, printing and perforating machinery in its business. Appellee had been in its employment" for more than two years, and, as she swears, had used all of these different machines in that time. It seems that there were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. WareCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Warnock's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Allen v. Pearce Dental Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Zornes v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API