Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Warnock's Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 14, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Logan

Beversing on appeal and affirming on cross-appeal.

On October 21, 1925, E. C. Warnock, with E. W. Bradford and Dee Wright, left Kehoe, in Carter county, driving in a Ford automobile to a place on Laurel creek, a distance of about seven miles from Kehoe, for the purpose of making a tap in the pipe line of the Cincinnati Gas Transportation Company. The automobile belonged to Wright, and he drove it. Warnock was a foreman for the Cincinnati Gas Transportation Company, in charge of that part of its pipe line extending from the Big Sandy river to Valley, in Lewis…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Louisville & I. R. v. SchuesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Louisville Lozier Co. v. SalleeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Monroe v. Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. Winchester's Ex'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Toner's Admr. v. South Covington & C. Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Handley v. LombardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RevlettIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Burks v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Nepier v. John P. Gorman Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API