Legal Opinion

Nance v. Chesney

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM UNION. Appeal from Chancery Court of Union County. H. B. Lindsay, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

Complainants, as executors of John Nance, deceased, filed this bill to collect certain notes for purchase money of land, which were *467executed by the defendant, Gordon Chesney, to his co-defendant, William Kelley, and by the latter assigned to complainants’ testator, John Nance. The facts, as found by the Court of Chancery Appeals, are substantially, viz.: On the 24th November, 1888, said William Kelley conveyed by deed the tract of land in controversy to Susan Chesney and Gordon Chesney, to each an undivided one-half interest, for the consideration of $1,500, $900 of which was paid, in full of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steele v. FriersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Kelley Bros. v. FletcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Anderson v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RaineyTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Blackburn v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Battier v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Heald v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API