Legal Opinion

Anthony Dixon v. John M. Pitchford

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 7, 1988No. 87-2243PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Anthony Dixon, a state prisoner, contends that prison officials violated his rights under the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the eighth amendment (as applied to the states by the Due Process Clause of the fourteenth) in two ways: by permitting another prisoner to attack him, and by tarrying in providing medical attention. He sought leave to proceed in the district court without prepayment of costs, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), and the district court granted this motion in part. The court thought the medical care portion of the suit frivolous and declined to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Larry Smith v. James ChransCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. James X. Reese v. Dr. James G. Ricketts, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Minghao Lee v. William J. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Matthew Hooker v. American Airlines Iberia Airlines of SpainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Lopez House v. Scott BelfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Luigi Aiello and Larry George v. Phil KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. GroceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API