Minghao Lee v. William J. Clinton
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, Lee, filed two insane complaints charging the United States and China with a conspiracy to “bio-chemically and bio-technologieally infect and invade” various people including Lee with a mind reading and mental torture device that Lee calls “Mind Accessing and Torturing via Remote Energy Transferring (MA-TRET).” To elude MATRET, Lee claims to have developed a variety of space technologies, oddly including an email system and nanny services, that will enable the victims of MATRET to relocate to MA-TRET-free planets. The district judge dismissed the suits as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Howard v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- David Newlin v. David W. Helman, Jesse E. Robinson v. B. Smith, James C. Griffin v. William R. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- James M. Debardeleben v. J.M. Quinlan, R.L. Matthews, N.W. Smith, R.G. Simpson, E. Cave, and W.A. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by481 opinions
- Chavis v. ChappiusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- In Re Jacta Est Alea, Formerly Known as Uriah Marquis PashaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Jurijus Kadamovas v. Michael StevensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Bruce v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
476 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.