Legal Opinion

Minghao Lee v. William J. Clinton

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 10, 2000No. 99-3250, 99-3859PublishedCited by 481 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, Lee, filed two insane complaints charging the United States and China with a conspiracy to “bio-chemically and bio-technologieally infect and invade” various people including Lee with a mind reading and mental torture device that Lee calls “Mind Accessing and Torturing via Remote Energy Transferring (MA-TRET).” To elude MATRET, Lee claims to have developed a variety of space technologies, oddly including an email system and nanny services, that will enable the victims of MATRET to relocate to MA-TRET-free planets. The district judge dismissed the suits as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Howard v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. David Newlin v. David W. Helman, Jesse E. Robinson v. B. Smith, James C. Griffin v. William R. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. James M. Debardeleben v. J.M. Quinlan, R.L. Matthews, N.W. Smith, R.G. Simpson, E. Cave, and W.A. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by481 opinions

  1. Chavis v. ChappiusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. In Re Jacta Est Alea, Formerly Known as Uriah Marquis PashaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Jurijus Kadamovas v. Michael StevensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Bruce v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

476 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API