Legal Opinion
Angel Jiminian, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Services, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 16, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00885Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 ANGEL JIMINIAN, et al., Case No.: 1:25-cv-00885-JLT-SKO 12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT BE GRANTED WITH LIMITED LEAVE 14 TO AMEND AS TO COUNTS ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, SIX, & TWELVE 15 PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES, et al., (Doc. 3) 16 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS 17 _____________________________________/ 18 19 Plaintiffs Angel Jiminian and Mercedes Jiminian (collectively “Plaintiffs”) proceed pro se 20 in this action that was…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.