Legal Opinion

DULYX v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 21, 2012No. 54, September Term, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

Maryland Rule 5 — 804(b)(1) allows for the admission of “former testimony” hearsay when the party against whom the declarant’s statement is offered “had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination” of the declarant at a prior “action or proceeding or in a deposition taken in compliance with law in the course of any action or proceeding.” We are asked in this case to determine whether the testimony of a witness at a pretrial motion to suppress the witness’s extrajudicial identification of Petitioner, Leon Dulyx A/K/A Leon Duylx, was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. United States v. Vincent Dinapoli, Louis Dinapoli, Nicholas Auletta, Edward Halloran, Aniello Migliore, and Alvin O. ChattinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Gordon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Hallowell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Alexis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API