Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Katres

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1914No. 8276PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to El Paso District Court. — Hon. J. E. Little, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues

Plaintiff in the court below, Katres, obtained a judgment against Nichols in 'the sum of $4,250.00 damages on account of injuries sustained from being run over by an automobile. The law firm of Orr, Robinett & Mason were plaintiff’s attorneys, and before the trial, filed notice of a claim for attorneys’ lien for their services on any judgment that might be obtained. Nichols brings the case here on error and asks for a supersedeas, and defendant in error has filed a motion.to dismiss the writ and proceeding, for the reason the judgment sought to be superseded has been settled. Plaintiff in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Floyd v. CochranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  2. Knowles v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. Hawthorne v. Hendrie & Bolthoff Manufacturing & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Burns v. National Mining, Tunnel & Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reserve Life Ins. Co., Dallas, Tex. v. FrankfatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Hammond, Whiting & East Chicago Railway Co. v. KaputIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API