Legal Opinion

Lacy v. United States Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 22, 2008No. 07-3961Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

Perry Lacy (“Lacy”), owner of the horse “Mark of Buck,” seeks review of the decision by the United State Department of Agriculture’s (“USDA”) Judicial Officer (“JO”) that he violated the Horse Protection Act (“HPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1821-1831, by attempting to show Mark of Buck when the horse was “sore.” Because substantial evidence supports the JO’s decision, we DENY Lacy’s petition for review, and AFFIRM the decision of the JO.

I

On the evening of August 25, 2002, Lacy entered Mark of Buck in the 64th Annual Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. William Darryl BlakemoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. William Dwaine Elliott v. Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Richard L. Thornton and Bill Cantrell v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Robert E. Parchman Virgil R. (Ray) Lemons Jack E. Hamilton v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Billy Gray v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API