Legal Opinion
Anderson v. CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 9, 2004No. 3:04-cr-00347PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WHELAN, District Judge.
Defendant Credit Collection Services (“Defendant” or “CCS”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Dawn Marie Anderson’s (“Plaintiffs”) Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) Complaint. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. See Fed.R.Civ. P.56. Both parties, through counsel, oppose the respective motions. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d.l). For the reasons outlined…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Robert S. Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robbins v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
- Schaired v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023