Legal Opinion

Petrella v. Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The Supreme Court, Queens County, properly determined that the petitioner, a Community Superintendent, is a public officer. The Community Superintendent is referred to in both the Education Law and in the petitioner’s contract of employment as the chief executive officer of the community school board and the educational system (see, Education Law § 2590-f [1]; § 2566 [1]). Furthermore, although the petitioner is employed pursuant to a contract, his position is created, and his powers and duties are prescribed, by statute (see, Education Law § 2590-e [1] [a]; § 2590-f [1];…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haller v. CarlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. O'Day v. YeagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Burke v. Van BuskirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Hansell v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Taylor v. BerberianNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Igneri v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API