State v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court of Weber County, Second District; Hon. A. E. Pratt, Judge. Proceedings by the State against certain intoxicating liquors, wherein Otto Meek claimed the liquors. On the appeal from the municipal court, the District Court dismissed the action. The State appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, J.
This was a proceeding begun on the complaint of the state, filed in the municipal court of Ogden City, against certain intoxicating liquors, seized by peace officers on the 18th day of August, 1917, under the provisions of chapter 2 of the Laws of Utah 1917, “prohibiting the manufacture and use of intoxicating liquors and regulating the sale and traffic therein,” entitled, “An act to define, prohibit and regulate the sale, manufacture, use, advertising of, possession of, or traffic in intoxicating liquor, malt or brewed drinks; providing for its enforcement, and providing penalties and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Wynehamer v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Seizure of 7 Barrels of WineSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- In re Zwissig for a Writ of Habeas CorpusNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. Certain Intoxicating LiquorsUtah Supreme Court · 1918
- Ex parte FrancisSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.