Legal Opinion

In re Zwissig for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1919No. 2369PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Application of John Zwissig for a writ of habeas corpus. The main question to be decided is as to the justice court’s jurisdiction. We deny jurisdiction because the charge does not constitute a public offense, and because the maximum penalty exceeds the jurisdiction of the justice court. Hurd, Hab. Corp. (2d Ed.) p. 325; .State ex rel. Morley v. Godfrey, 54 W. Va. 54; Judy v. Lashley, 50 W. Va. 628; Church, Hab.

Read the full summary

Application of John Zwissig for a writ of habeas corpus. The main question to be decided is as to the justice court’s jurisdiction. We deny jurisdiction because the charge does not constitute a public offense, and because the maximum penalty exceeds the jurisdiction of the justice court. Hurd, Hab. Corp. (2d Ed.) p. 325; .State ex rel. Morley v. Godfrey, 54 W. Va. 54; Judy v. Lashley, 50 W. Va. 628; Church, Hab. Corp. sec. 351. Section 7 of the act, copied from the West Virginia statute, has been construed in that state. Emsweller v. Wallace, 88 S. E. 787. Under the well-known rule of…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Coleman, C. J.:

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. A complaint was filed with the justice of the peace of Reno township, charging that the petitioner did “wilfully and *362unlawfully" have in his possession for personal use and otherwise intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky, on a public street within the city of Reno, county of Washoe, State of Nevada, to wit, Commercial Row.”

The section of the prohibition act under which the prosecution was instituted reads:

“Sec. 7. It shall be unlawful for any person to keep or have for personal use or otherwise, or to use, of permit…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StofchekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Application of FilippiniNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. VelardeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Harris v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Ex parte SloanNevada Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API