Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2001No. 77917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James D. Sweeney, Judge.

An accelerated appeal is authorized pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc.App.R. 11.1. The purpose of an accelerated docket is to allow an appellate court to render a brief and conclusory decision. Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn. (1983), 11 Ohio App.3d 158, 11 OBR 240, 463 N.E.2d 655; App.R. 11.1(E).

Plaintiff-appellant state of Ohio appeals on the accelerated docket from the sentence imposed by the trial court on defendant-appellee Eugene Mitchell (Mitchell). For the reasons adduced below, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

A review of the record on appeal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RecinosOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. RichmondOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. Pickett, 91343 (5-7-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. PrestonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API