Legal Opinion

Wimpfheimer v. Wimpfheimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

Prior to the commencement of the present action for divorce, the parties hereto had entered into a separation agreement which, among other things, provided that the husband would pay the wife $666.67 a month for her support and maintenance. The agreement also contained a scheme for the adjustment of the sums to be paid thereunder in the event of change in the net income of the husband. It contained a clause which provided:

*305“ Sixth. The parties hereto covenant and agree that if hereafter an interlocutory or final judgment or decree shall be entered in any action or proceeding for a divorce or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Kyff v. KyffNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Kunker v. KunkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Stoddard v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Braunworth v. BraunworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lerner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  2. Carson v. CarsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. McCanliss v. McCanlissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. Schreck v. SchreckNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Keve v. SteinbergNew York Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API