Legal Opinion

Eastern Massachusetts Street Ry. Co. v. Transmarine Corp.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 30, 1930No. 2451Published

In the libel, after setting out that it was a New Jersey corporation engaged in operating and chartering steamships and was' the owner pro hae vice of the steamer Surico, and that the Pore River Coal Company was a Massachusetts corporation, the libelant alleged: (1) That on or about the 31st day of January, 1927, it chartered to the coal company “the full coal-carrying capacity of the steamer Surico for two consecutive voyages from Hampton Roads, Virginia, to discharging…

Read the full summary

In the libel, after setting out that it was a New Jersey corporation engaged in operating and chartering steamships and was' the owner pro hae vice of the steamer Surico, and that the Pore River Coal Company was a Massachusetts corporation, the libelant alleged: (1) That on or about the 31st day of January, 1927, it chartered to the coal company “the full coal-carrying capacity of the steamer Surico for two consecutive voyages from Hampton Roads, Virginia, to discharging berth alongside wharf of the Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Company, Pore River, Quincy, in the State of…

1Opinion of the Court

42 F.2d 58 (1930)

EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS STREET RY. CO.

v.

TRANSMARINE CORPORATION et al.

No. 2451.

Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

June 30, 1930.

Fitz-Henry Smith, Jr., of Boston, Mass., for appellant.

Eugene P. Carver, Jr., of Boston, Mass., and Carroll Single, of New York City (Carver & Schell, of Boston, Mass., and Single & Single, of New York City, on the brief), for appellee Transmarine Corporation.

Albert T. Gould and Edward A. Neiley, both of Boston, Mass. (Blodgett, Jones, Burnham & Bingham, of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for appellee Fore River Coal Co.

Before BINGHAM and WILSON,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. The AdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Compagnie Francaise De Navigation a Vapeur v. BonnasseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd BrazilieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. The PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API