Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Palmer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1991No. 01024PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant, Annette Jane Landis, takes this appeal from a June 4, 1990 order adjudicating her one-year old child, Edward C. Wissinger (hereinafter “Eddie”), dependent. The order was entered after Eddie’s eight-year old half-sister, Tanya Palmer, died under suspicious circumstances. Appellant argues that the Westmoreland County Children’s Bureau did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that Eddie was a dependent child. For the following reasons, we reverse.

The deceased minor child, Tanya, was the daughter of Annette Jane Landis and Arnold Palmer. The minor child, Eddie, is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Interest of LaRueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. La Rocca TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. In the Interest of PernishekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. In the Interest of WhittleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. In Interest of Theresa E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re ReadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. In the Interest of J.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. In re J.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. In re J.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. In the Interest of J.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API