Legal Opinion

Swedish Health Services, App. v. Dept. Of Health Of The State Of Wa., Res.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 31, 2015No. 72612-9-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Cox, J.

The Department of Health grants certificates of need to hospitals within identified planning areas based on regulatory criteria. Here, one of two primary criteria is that “[a] 11 existing [percutaneous coronary interventions] programs in that planning area are meeting or exceeding the minimum volume standard.” It is undisputed that two such programs in the identified planning area where Swedish Health Services seeks a certificate of need are not meeting this “minimum volume standard.” Because controlling regulations bar issuing a certificate of need under these circumstances, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Overlake Hospital Ass'n v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Overlake Hosp. Ass'n v. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. King County Public Hospital District No. 2 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Marion Hospital Corp. v. Illinois Health Facilities Planning BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Univ. Comm. Hosp. v. Dept. of HealthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API