Legal Opinion

Svenson v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 23, 1897No. Nos. 10,271—(24)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Willis, J., granting a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This is a personal injury case, the trial whereof *15resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The trial court, on motion of plaintiff, granted a new trial, on account of the alleged misconduct of the jury, and the defendant appealed from the order.

The granting of a new trial for the misconduct of the jury is a matter resting largely in the discretion of the trial court. While this is not an arbitrary discretion, yet where there is competent evidence fairly tending to rebut the presumption of right action on the part of the jury, and to sustain the charge of misconduct, the exercise of' the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodbury v. City of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Hewitt v. Pioneer-Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  3. Koehler v. ClearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  4. Oswald v. Minneapolis & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Bradt v. RommelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. LauthOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. SalversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. State v. HookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API