Legal Opinion

Hanrahan v. City of Janesville

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

'Appeal from an order. of tbe circuit court for Rock county: Geoege Gkimm, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order dismissing an appeal prosecuted by the plaintiffs from the disallowance of a claim by the common council of the city of Janesville. On November 21, 1905, a claim was filed with the city clerk of said city, entitled as follows: “City of Janesville to Hanrahan and Lindquist, Attorneys for M. J. Benson.”

Read the full summary

'Appeal from an order. of tbe circuit court for Rock county: Geoege Gkimm, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order dismissing an appeal prosecuted by the plaintiffs from the disallowance of a claim by the common council of the city of Janesville. On November 21, 1905, a claim was filed with the city clerk of said city, entitled as follows: “City of Janesville to Hanrahan and Lindquist, Attorneys for M. J. Benson.” The amount claimed was $13,950.40. The claim was . founded upon extra work alleged to have been performed in connection with the construction of sewers in the city of…

1Opinion of the CourtBae.Nes, J.

Tbe circuit court was entirely justified in bolding that- tbe claim in question was ambiguous as to ownership. If Hanrahan and Lindquist were filing it as their claim, then it is not apparent why they styled themselves “attorneys for M. J. Benson.” If they filed it as tbe claim of Benson, then tbe query arises: Why was it not drawn in some manner indicating with reasonable certainty that Benson was tbe claimant, and that tbe Hanrahan & Lindquist Company filed it as his attorneys in fact? In view of tbe *4i’ecord made and that attempted to be made, the most probable conjecture is that when…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rice v. Ashland CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Telford v. City of AshlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Eaton v. Supervisors of Manitowoc CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Drinkwine v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Oshkosh Water Works Co. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. City of OconomowocWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Moyer v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Trustees of University Co-Operative Co. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Kremer v. AriansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Rogers v. City of OconomowocWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API