Harmon v. Haas
North Dakota Supreme Court
1OpinionBurr, J.
(On motion for rehearing.) Appellant asks for rehearing on the ground that this court has overlooked defendant’s requests for instructions Nos. 5 and 6. It is true that defendant made such request, but in his motion for a new trial he did not specify as error the refusal to give the instructions requested. The attention of the trial court therefore was not called to such matters and that court was not required to pass upon the effect of refusal. “Grounds not stated in the motion or written statement will not be considered at the hearing by the trial court.” Kanable v. Great Northern R. Co. 45…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brissman v. ThistlethwaiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Poirier Manufacturing Co. v. KittsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Jensen v. ClausenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- O'Dell v. HineyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Fargo Loan Agency v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.