Legal Opinion

O'Dell v. Hiney

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1922PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.

Tbis action was in claim and delivery for tbe possession of two beifers, fifty-three chickens, eleven turkeys and six ducks. Tbe case was tried to a jury. Tbe plaintiff prevailed. Defendant moved for a new trial. • Tbe motion was denied and defendant appealed. Tbe facts necessary to an understanding of tbe case are as follows: Tbe plaintiff is tbe owner of a farm situated in Ward county. On or about October 1, 1919, be entered into a written lease with tbe defendant Iiiney whereby such farm was leased to Hiney for a term of three years. Tbe lease provided that the plaintiff should furnish to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State v. GlassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Horton v. Wright, Barrett, & Stilwell Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Willoughby v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Cohn v. WyngardenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Umphrey Ex Rel. Umphrey v. DeeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Mann v. Policyholders' National Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. AmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Zimbelman v. LahNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Goodman v. MevorahNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API