O'Dell v. Hiney
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.
Tbis action was in claim and delivery for tbe possession of two beifers, fifty-three chickens, eleven turkeys and six ducks. Tbe case was tried to a jury. Tbe plaintiff prevailed. Defendant moved for a new trial. • Tbe motion was denied and defendant appealed. Tbe facts necessary to an understanding of tbe case are as follows: Tbe plaintiff is tbe owner of a farm situated in Ward county. On or about October 1, 1919, be entered into a written lease with tbe defendant Iiiney whereby such farm was leased to Hiney for a term of three years. Tbe lease provided that the plaintiff should furnish to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. GlassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Horton v. Wright, Barrett, & Stilwell Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Willoughby v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Cohn v. WyngardenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Umphrey Ex Rel. Umphrey v. DeeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Mann v. Policyholders' National Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. AmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Zimbelman v. LahNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Goodman v. MevorahNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.