Legal Opinion

Murciano v. Urroz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 1984No. 83-2022PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

455 So.2d 463 (1984)

Miguel MURCIANO, Appellant,

v.

Jose Antonio URROZ, a/K/a Jose Urroz Mayorga, Appellee.

No. 83-2022.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 7, 1984.

Rehearing Denied September 17, 1984.

Armstrong & Mejer and Timothy Armstrong, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Steven R. Berger, Pomeroy, Betts & Miller, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

This is an action based upon fraud, conspiracy to defraud, and conspiracy to convert property. The trial court entered judgment against appellant Murciano in accordance with the jury verdict…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Utility Battery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Conner v. Atlas Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. A & P BAKERY SUP & EQUIP v. HawatmehDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. EFK Collins Corp. v. SMMG, INCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Atlantic Sport Boat Sales, Inc. v. Cigarette Racing Team, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  3. Forest's Mens Shop v. SchmidtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Don Carlos Foods, Inc. v. Liquid Carbonic Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Forest's Mens Shop v. SchmidtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API