Legal Opinion

People v. Frooks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 16, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Joseph Frooks, from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 25th day of August, 1916, convicting the defendant of a violation of the provisions of section 118 of the Sanitary Code of the City of New York, and also from an order denying defendant’s motion to arrest the judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

Section 118 of the Sanitary Code provides as follows: “ No person shall make, prepare, put up, administer, or dispense any prescription, decoction, or medicine, under any false or misleading name, direction, or pretense; nor shall any ingredient be substituted for another in any prescription, nor shall any false or misleading representation be made by any person to any other, as to the kind, quality, purpose, or effect of any drug, medicine, decoction, drink, or other substance, offered *380or intended to be taken as food or medicine.” (See Code of Ordinances of City of New York,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. . DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. People v. PillionNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People ex rel. New York Disposal Corp. v. FreschiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. People v. SpierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. People v. Wacke, New York County Courts1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SessaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1964
  2. People v. Perfecto Chemical Co.New York Court of Special Session · 1924
  3. Di Silvestro v. Court of Special SessionsNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API