Legal Opinion
State v. Hooker
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 19, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4262PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
The state has brought this special action to challenge the granting by the trial court of a motion in limine to preclude the introduction of documents from the Department of Motor Vehicles that would show the suspension of the real party in interest’s driver’s license. Because the petitioner has no remedy by means of appeal and because we believe the trial court acted in excess of its jurisdiction, we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.
On April 7, 1981, the real party in interest, Ruperto Cruz Ortiz, had his driver’s license suspended due to frequent traffic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. GinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Parker v. PrinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988