Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 12, 1994No. 93-45 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

I

WIESE, Judge.

Plaintiff is a surety that had filed an earlier suit in this court contesting the Government’s default termination of a construction contract on which plaintiff was secondarily liable under a performance bond. That suit was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, the gist of the ruling being that, in the absence of any payment on the performance bond or the expenditure of any funds pursuant to a *542“takeover” agreement with the Government, plaintiff could, neither claim the status of a subrogee nor assert any contractual right of its own; hence, there was no contract basis upon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Somali Development Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  3. Balboa Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Skelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  3. American Renovation & Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API