Legal Opinion · Dissent

Salvador Martin v. Construction Laborer's Pension Trust for Southern California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1991No. 88-5927Published

1DissentPregerson, Circuit Judge

I do not believe that the four-year limitations period began to run when Martin inquired about his pension credits and the Construction Laborers Pension Trust (the “Trust”) denied his appeal. Moreover, even if I agreed with the majority’s view of the applicable limitations period, I would hold that equitable considerations preclude the Trust from relying on it in this case. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.

I

The majority acknowledges that the California statute of limitations applicable to actions on written instruments should apply in this ease. It asserts, however, that when the cause…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Naton v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Stamatina Stallcop v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals the Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Hospital & Institutional Workers Union, Local 250Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Oeth v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Napa Ass'n of Public Employees v. County of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API