Salvador Martin v. Construction Laborer's Pension Trust for Southern California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentPregerson, Circuit Judge
I do not believe that the four-year limitations period began to run when Martin inquired about his pension credits and the Construction Laborers Pension Trust (the “Trust”) denied his appeal. Moreover, even if I agreed with the majority’s view of the applicable limitations period, I would hold that equitable considerations preclude the Trust from relying on it in this case. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.
I
The majority acknowledges that the California statute of limitations applicable to actions on written instruments should apply in this ease. It asserts, however, that when the cause…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Naton v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Stamatina Stallcop v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals the Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Hospital & Institutional Workers Union, Local 250Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Oeth v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Napa Ass'n of Public Employees v. County of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.