Legal Opinion

Sun Oil Company v. The Vickers Refining Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1969No. 19422PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

In 1963, Sunray DX Oil Company 1 (Sunray) agreed to supply gasoline to a competitor, Vickers Refining Company, for a period of at least ten years. In December of 1965, Sunray, asserting that the agreement provided for price fixing in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 2 sought a declaratory judgment that it was void and unenforceable. The trial court declared the contract to be valid and Sunray appeals. The opinion below is reported sub nom. Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Vickers Refining Co., 285 F.Supp. 403 (W.D.Mo.1968). We affirm.

Sunray is a “major” oil company operating…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. Container Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Cleo Syrup Corporation v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  5. Whiting Stoker Co. v. Chicago Stoker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Merritt Dickstein v. Edmond Dupont, as They Are Partners of Francis I. Dupont & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  2. Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Incorporated v. Clark Oil & Refining Corporation, Intervenor: United States ForCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. Catalyst Research Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
  4. Medtronic, Incorporated v. Catalyst Research CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. AAMCO Automatic Transmissions, Inc. v. TayloeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API