Legal Opinion
AAMCO Automatic Transmissions, Inc. v. Tayloe
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 7, 1976No. Civ. A. 73-391 and 73-1615PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VanARTSDALEN, District Judge.
Pending are cross motions for summary judgment. The primary issue is whether the record establishes a tying arrangement violative of antitrust law. Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc. (Aamco) instituted action against Harry M. Tayloe and other defendants 1 complaining that Tayloe had conspired to breach and breached his franchise contract. In response, Tayloe filed a class action counterclaim alleging that Aamco violated § 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act 2 by tying the purchase of equipment and repair parts to the purchase of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Geraghty v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Sims v. MacK Truck Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.