Legal Opinion
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 2, 1990No. C2-87-766PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRAHAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Norfolk and Western Railway Company (N & W) is an interstate rail carrier which owns and operates railroad bridges in the State of Ohio. In March of 1987, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) ordered N & W to provide walkways and railings for trainmen along at least one side of two N & W bridges located in Medina, Ohio and Akron, Ohio. This order was based upon the provisions of § 4901:3-1-05(D) of the Ohio Administrative Code which provides that:
A suitable walk and railing from which trainmen may walk shall be provided along at…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Company v. The Public Utilities Commission of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Rooney v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Miller v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996