Legal Opinion
Miller v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 6, 1996No. 94 C 5176PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Defendant Chicago & North Western Transportation Company (“C & NW”) has filed a motion in limine that poses a thorny question as to expert testimony proposed to be offered by plaintiff Varden Miller (“Miller”). C & NW seeks to keep Eugene Holland (“Holland”) from testifying about whether C & NW complied with (1) regulations promulgated pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA,” 29 U.S.C. §§ 651 to 678), (2) the Melrose Park Building Code and (3) the safety recommendations published by the American National Standards…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Charles A. Ries, III v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, A/K/A Amtrak National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Linda Thiele, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Craig Thiele v. Norfolk & Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schultz v. NORTHEAST ILL. REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Costantino v. VentrigliaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Callahan v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Prater v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Linda Huffman, Individually and as Personal Rep. of the Estate of Jerry Huffman v. Dexter Axle Company & Evans Equipment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.