Legal Opinion

David Joyner v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided January 14, 2010No. 02-09-00355-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-355-CV

DAVID JOYNER APPELLANT

V

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1)

------------

Appellant David Joyner is attempting to appeal from the trial court’s denial of his pretrial motion to recuse. An interlocutory order denying a motion to recuse is not appealable. Means v. State , 825 S.W.2d 260, 260–61 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no pet.); see Apolinar v. State , 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Wright v. State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Apolinar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Wright v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
  4. Means v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API