Legal Opinion

City of Ozark v. Nichols

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 19, 1997No. CA 96-491PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Margaret Meads, Judge.

The City of Ozark, Arkansas, filed a condemnation complaint against appellees on June 14, 1993, for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a water-storage tank, water line, and roadway on land owned by appellees. Ozark posted a seventy-five hundred dollar ($7,500.00) bond with the circuit clerk’s office, and the circuit court entered an order of possession in favor of Ozark on June 14, 1993. Ozark filed a second amended complaint on November 30, 1994, to add newly discovered defendants. Answers were filed seeking a jury trial for the purpose of determining just…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harrison v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. Arkansas Rural Medical Practice Student Loan & Scholarship Board v. LuterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Harper v. Wheatley Implement Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Damron v. University Estates, Phase II, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Barnett v. Arkansas Transport Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Second Injury Fund v. FurmanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Calvert v. Estate of CalvertCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Calvert v. Estate of CalvertCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  5. City of Fort Smith v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API