Baldwin v. Dearborn
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Wood. Tried below before Hon. John Gregg. Suit by defendant in error as administrator de bonis non of the estate of V. Hobbs against George W. Vickery, a former administrator of said estate, and his sureties upon his administration bond. The plaintiffs in error excepted to the sufficiency of the petition, for the reasons stated in the Opinion, which exception was overruled, and upon this ruling assigned as error the case comes up.
1Opinion of the Court
Roberts, J. -
There is no statement of facts or bill of exceptions in the record of this case, and the only question which can be inquired into is the ruling of the Court overruling the exceptions of defendants below, Baldwin et al., to the sufficiency of Dearborn’s petition. The petitioner seeks to recover, as administrator de bonis non, of the former administrator, Yickery, and the sureties on his bond, damages for failing to deliver over the property in his hands on demand, and to make a settlement for the funds of the estate in his possession. The petition and amendments set forth the bond…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Ward v. Maryland Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Johnson v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Roe v. DaileyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1880
- Ward v. Maryland Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1942